II. Who is Catholic?
III. What are the true teachings of the Catholic Faith?
IV. Is it necessary to be Catholic to be saved?
V. Can the Church’s Dogmatic teaching change?
VI. What must we do to be truly called Catholic?
There is a very
common practice today of adding various prefixes to the wonderful title of
“Catholic”. These are not the acceptable
ones such as: Roman, Greek, Melkite, Maronite, Syro-Malabar, etc which refer to
the legitimate diversity of Catholic liturgies and cultures. The ones I refer to are those such as:
Traditionalist, Neo-Conservative, Liberal, etc.
This has resulted in great scandal to the world, because of these vast
numbers of men and women calling themselves Catholic and dissenting from the
teaching and/or the authority of the Church.
These dissenters have thus removed themselves from the Church and no
longer have the right to call themselves Catholic at all, but yet to the world
they are representatives of Catholicism.
It also shows only further division in Christendom, which is a great
stumbling block to potential converts.
This trend is nothing new and was spoken about nearly one hundred years
ago by our Holy Father Pope Benedict XV in his encyclical Ad beatissimi
apostolorum of November 1st, 1914:
“It is, moreover, Our will that Catholics
should abstain from certain appellations which have recently been brought into
use to distinguish one group of Catholics from another. They are to be avoided
not only as "profane novelties of words," out of harmony with both
truth and justice, but also because they give rise to great trouble and
confusion among Catholics. Such is the
nature of Catholicism that it does not admit of more or less, but must be held
as a whole or as a whole rejected: (Athanasian Creed). There is no need of
adding any qualifying terms to the profession of Catholicism: it is quite
enough for each one to proclaim “Christian is my name and Catholic my
surname," only let him endeavour to be in reality what he calls
himself.” (Paragraph #24)
I understand, however, the position of many faithful Catholics who call
themselves “Conservative” or even “Traditionalist” Catholics in order to
differentiate themselves from the many dissenting Catholics who while not
actually professing what the Church teachers nor in any way practicing their
faith still insist upon calling themselves Catholic. Still these appellations have often developed
into a very dangerous drawing of lines, even among good Catholics who are doing
their best to be faithful. We have on
one side those who suggest that the Church as it was before the Second Vatican
Council is the true Church, and on the other those who would say that the
Church after the council is the true Church, while rejecting what came before. This rupture is just what our wonderful Holy
Father Pope Benedict XVI (may his reign be long) has spoken of on a number of
occasions:
"Certainly the results of Vatican II
seem cruelly opposed to the expectations of everyone, beginning with those of
Pope John XXIII and then of Pope Paul VI: expected was a new Catholic unity and
instead we have been exposed to dissension which, to use the words of Pope Paul
VI, seems to have gone from self-criticism to self-destruction. Expected was a
new enthusiasm, and many wound up discouraged and bored. Expected was a great
step forward, instead we find ourselves faced with a progressive process of
decadence which has developed for the most part under the sign of a calling back
to the Council, and has therefore contributed to discrediting it for many. The
net result therefore seems negative. I am repeating here what I said ten years
after the conclusion of the work: it is incontrovertible that this period
has definitely been unfavorable for the Catholic Church."
-Cardinal Ratzinger (Now Pope Benedict XVI),
L'Osservatore Romano, 24 December 1984
"The Second Vatican Council has not been
treated as a part of the entire living Tradition of the Church, but as an end
of Tradition, a new start from zero. The truth is that this particular
Council defined no dogma at all, and deliberately chose to remain on a modest
level, as a merely pastoral council; and yet many treat it as though it had
made itself into a sort of superdogma which takes away the importance of all
the rest."
-Cardinal Ratzinger (Now Pope Benedict XVI),
address to the Chilean Bishops, 13 July 1988, Santiago Chile
“How much Christ suffers in his own Church.
How often is the Holy Sacrament of His real presence abused. How often must He
enter empty and evil hearts. How often do we celebrate only ourselves without
even realizing that He is there. How often is His word twisted and misused.
What little faith is present behind so many theories and so many empty words.
How much filth there is in the Church, and even among those in the priesthood
who should belong entirely to Him. How much pride. How much self complacency.
What little respect for the sacrament of reconciliation where He waits for us
to raise us up whenever we fall. How much filth there is. How much filth.”
-Cardinal Ratzinger (Now Pope Benedict XVI), Sermon
given on Good Friday of 2005 just 3 ½ weeks before being elected Supreme
Pontiff
And he clearly points out the focal point of these troubles in the
Church:
"I am convinced that the crisis in the
Church that we are experiencing today is to a large extent due to the
disintegration of the liturgy.”
-Cardinal Ratzinger (Now Pope Benedict XVI),
"Milestones: Memoirs 1927-1977" (SF, CA: Ignatius), p. 149.
"What happened at the Council was
something else entirely: in the place of the liturgy as the fruit of
development came fabricated liturgy. We abandoned the organic, living, process
of growth and development over centuries, and replaced it - as in a manufacturing
process - with a fabrication, a banal on-the-spot product."
-Cardinal Ratzinger (Now Pope Benedict XVI), From
the preface to the French edition of "Reforms of the Roman Liturgy Its
Problems and Background" 1993
"The second great event at the beginning
of my years in Regensburg was the publication of the Missal of Paul VI, which
was accompanied by the almost total prohibition, after a transitional phase of
only half a year, of using the missal we had had until then. (...) The
prohibition of the missal that was now decreed, a missal that had known
continuous growth over the centuries, starting with the sacramentaries of the
ancient Church, introduced a breach of the liturgy whose consequences could
only be tragic."
-Cardinal Ratzinger (Now Pope Benedict XVI), "Milestones
– Memoirs 1927 – 1977", Joseph Ratzinger, Ignatius, San Francisco, 1998,
p. 146
Here our Holy Father has just most plainly elucidated the fundamental
principal of “Lex orandi Lex credenda”, which means: the law of worship is the
law of belief. This means that the way
we worship directly influences how we believe and vice versa. And then just a few weeks ago on the Feast of
Saint Francis of Assisi (10/4/11) Cardinal Piacenza, Prefect of
the Congregation for the Clergy, made the following remarks to seminarians of
the Archdiocese of Los Angeles:
“Yours
will probably be the first generation that will correctly interpret the Second
Vatican Council, not according to the "spirit" of the Council,
which has brought so much disorientation to the Church, but according to
what the Conciliar Event really said, in its texts to the Church and to the
world…There cannot be, nor could there be, a pre-Conciliar Church and a
post-Conciliar Church! Were it thus, the second one - ours - would be
historically and theologically illegitimate! There is only one Church
of Christ, of which you are part, that goes from Our Lord to the Apostles, from
the Blessed Virgin Mary to the Fathers and the Doctors of the Church, from the
Middle Ages to the Renaissance, from Romanesque to Gothic to Baroque, and thus
until our days, uninterruptedly, without any dissolution of continuity, ever!”
We need to remember that we must be with the Church in what it
actually teaches. We must be faithful to
what it is teaching, has taught, and will always teach: the one only truth of
Jesus Christ.
“He that is not with me, is against me; and he that gathereth not with
me, scattereth.”
–Luke 11:23; Matt 12:30
“But because thou art lukewarm, and neither
cold, not hot, I will begin to vomit thee out of my mouth. Because
thou sayest: I am rich, and made wealthy, and have need of nothing: and knowest
not, that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked. I
counsel thee to buy of me gold fire tried, that thou mayest be made rich; and
mayest be clothed in white garments, and that the shame of thy nakedness may
not appear; and anoint thy eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see. Such as I love,
I rebuke and chastise. Be zealous
therefore, and do penance. Behold, I stand at the gate, and knock. If any
man shall hear my voice, and open to me the door, I will come in to him, and
will sup with him, and he with me. To him that shall overcome, I will give to
sit with me in my throne: as I also have overcome, and am set down with my
Father in his throne. He that hath an
ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith to the churches.”
–The Apocalypse of Saint John
3:16-22
1 comment:
Hm, I wonder if "orthodox" counts as an undesirable prefix? Since it implies that one follows (or attempts to!) the Church in her fullness, nothing more, nothing less? (I think, anyway, it is probably a better alternative than Traditionalist or Conservative.)
Word of advice from a writer and a blogger: break these posts up into series. I couldn't read all this one! ;) It's difficult to sit and read a 6000 word post on a screen in one sitting, but there are logical points where this post could be divided, and thus more easily read. :)
Post a Comment